#WINDOWS 10, VERSAO 1703 INSTALL#
#WINDOWS 10, VERSAO 1703 UPDATE#
#WINDOWS 10, VERSAO 1703 DRIVER#

This computer had Windows 10 version 1607 and also had a Windows defender offline blue screen boot loop.

#WINDOWS 10, VERSAO 1703 UPDATE#

This update method was selected and this morning it displayed:

#WINDOWS 10, VERSAO 1703 DRIVER#

With Windows driver verifier was tested with windows 10 version 1703 and the blue screen boot loop was fixed by Microsoft so that it is no longer occurs.ДЄ second computer had the option via windows updates to get an early edition of 1703. The Windows defender offline incompatibility problem And as above it was upgraded to version 1703 yesterday without any problems. Then the windows 10 version 1607 was installed. On the SSD drive were deleted making the drive unallocated. The troubleshooting menu on a windiso did not have startup options with safe mode and command prompt to turn off windows driver verifier.

This computer was used to reproduce a Windows defender offline blue screen boot loop. This is disk management on the computer that was upgraded using the Microsoft Update Assistant: Or some other reason.Yesterday I upgraded one computer from windows 10 version 1607 to version 1703 (OS Build 15063.13) using the Microsoft Update Assistant.

#WINDOWS 10, VERSAO 1703 INSTALL#

It would only be an advantage for people who want to wait to install an update for whatever reason, whether fear of the updates causing problems and they want to wait to see what they do for others, or wanting to wait so they can perform a full backup before installing the updates. If the latter, then the ability to do so wouldn't make any difference for someone on a capped service as it would use the data by downloading the updates and parking them for installation at a later date. I haven't seen any distinction as to whether pausing updates pauses the download of the update, or just the installation of it. With this said, something just dawned on me. One doesn't have to wait the 35 days, but can pause them and then choose to perform the updates at any time within that time period. I think the idea of it being 35 days is because most data capped services have 30 day data allotments. When I brought up the fact that just about every single article written on the ability to pause updates references the 35 day amount and that their 7 day claim was spurious, I never recevied a reply. I've never been close enough in my data use and allotmentВ to need to worry about I did just that, and, oddly enough, someone from Microsoft said it was strange that my laptop was showing 35 days as they should all show 7 days. I've never used the ability to set my laptop to a metered connection with WiFi, nor have I done so with the new ability to do the same with my desktop and a direct LAN connection. In the end, though, like I said, I'll probably never use that ability, anyway. I wonder if the difference between the allowable days to pause is due to the one being OEM and the other being retail. My desktop (built by me), on the other hand, started with a retail version of Windows 7 Pro, then upgraded with a retail version of Windows 8 Pro, then the free upgrades from that. All of them were done with the free upgrades. My laptop (a Dell) originally had Windows 8В Pro OEM preloaded and was upgraded to Windows 8.1 Pro, then Windows 10 Pro and then to the present version of Windows 10 Pro. It was only a question of curiosity as to why one of my computers would show a different ability than the other when they have the exact same version of Windows 10. With that said, and with the initial question asked, I doubt that I will ever use the ability to pause my updates. Guess I should have searched a little more thoroughly.

Windows 10, versao 1703